Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District v. Imperial Valley Healthcare District et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Plaintiff: Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District
Defendant: Robert Amparano
Respondent: Imperial Valley Healthcare District, Enola Berker, Katherine Burnworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Sidman
as 24-1385
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Cross Plaintiff: PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Cross Defendant: CHARLES SIDMAN
Defendant: BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Town of Bar Harbor, et al
as 24-1317
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Interested Party: PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant: BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Cross Defendant: CHARLES SIDMAN
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Town of Bar Harbor, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Cross Plaintiff: PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant: BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Cross Defendant: CHARLES SIDMAN
Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc. v. Santacroce, et al
as 24-1259
Plaintiff: GREENLEAF COMPASSIONATE CARE CENTER, INC.
Defendant: MATTHEW SANTACROCE, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, ERICA FERRELLI, in her official capacity as Chief of the Office of Cannabis Regulation within the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, KIMBERLY AHERN, in her official capacity as Chair of the Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and others
The People of the State of California v. Dylan Perry et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California and Dylan Scott Perry
Defendant: Board and CEO of Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County doing business as L.A. Care Health Plan doing business as L.A. Care Plan de Salud and The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc. v. Matthew Santacroce et al
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff: Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc.
Defendant: Matthew Santacroce, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, Erica Ferrelli, in her official capacity as Chief of the Office of Cannabis Regulation within the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, Kimberly Ahern, in her official capacity as Chair of the Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Volokh v. James
as 23-356
Plaintiff / Appellee: Eugene Volokh, Locals Technology Inc. and Rumble Canada Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of New York
ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS et al v. TOWN OF BAR HARBOR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00416
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR LC doing business as HARBORSIDE HOTEL and others
Defendant: TOWN OF BAR HARBOR
Intervenor Plaintiff: PENOBSCOT BAY & RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Petitioner: CHARLES SIDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Volokh et al v. James We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10195
Plaintiff: Eugene Volokh, Locals Technology Inc. and Rumble Canada Inc.
Defendant: Attorney General Letitia James and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?