Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Packard v. Dunphy, et al
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. PACKARD
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN M. DUNPHY, former Chief Justice and his successors in office Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Department, JOHN D. CASEY, Chief Justice Massachusetts Probate and Family Court, PAMELA CASEY O'BRIEN, Register of Probate and her successors in office Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Department, Essex Division and others
Defendant:
WILL FULLER, President and CEO and his successor in office Transamerica Corporation and MARK PEARSON, President and CEO and his successor in office Equitable Holdings, Inc.
Packard v. Dunphy et al
as 1:2021cv11427
Plaintiff:
David A. Packard
Defendant:
Hon. Sean M. Dunphy, Hon. John D. Casey, Pamela A Casey O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pearson et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2020cv02888
Plaintiff:
George Pearson, Amanda Hamerman, Steve Balich and others
Defendant:
Governor Jay Robert Pritzker and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Leonard Fyock, et al v. City of Sunnyvale, et al
as 14-15408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD FYOCK, SCOTT HOCHSTETLER, WILLIAM DOUGLAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, THE MAYOR OF SUNNYVALE, ANTHONY SPITALERI, in his official capacity and others
Pearson Education, Inc v. Dong et al
as 5:2014mc80066
Plaintiff:
Pearson Education, Inc
Defendant:
Zhiming Dong and Xiaodong Zhang
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Fyock et al v. The City of Sunnyvale et al
as 5:2013cv05807
Plaintiff:
Leonard Fyock , Scott Hochstetler , William Douglas and others
Defendant:
The City of Sunnyvale , The Mayor of Sunnyvale , Anthony Spitaleri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fyock et al v. The City of Sunnyvale et al
as 4:2013cv05807
Plaintiff:
William Douglas, Leonard Fyock, Scott Hochstetler and others
Defendant:
Frank Grgurina, Anthony Spitaleri, The Chief of the Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
