Cases 1 - 10 of 22
James Peeples v. AR Child Support Enforcement, et al
as 24-1619
Plaintiff:
James Peeples
Defendant:
State of Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement, Arkansas Secretary of State, DMV and United States Department of State
USA v. State of Texas
as 24-50149
Plaintiff:
United States of America, American Gateways, County of El Paso, Texas and others
Defendant:
State of Texas, Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, Texas Department of Public Safety and others
Amicus Curiae:
America's Future, Gun Owners of America, Incorporated, Gun Owners Foundation and others
Bio Gen LLC, et al v. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, et al
as 23-3237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC, doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Governor; in her official capacity, Tim Griffin, Attorney General; in his official capacity, Todd Murray, in his official capacity as prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Caleb Barnett, et al v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 23-1825
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CALEB BARNETT, BRIAN NORMAN, HOOD'S GUNS & MORE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Djedi Order v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DJEDI ORDER and Heru Spencer
Defendant:
State of Montana, State Of Florida, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Texas v. Yellen
as 22-10560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Richard K. Delmar, in his official capacity as Acting Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Taxpayers Union Foundation, Buckeye Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance and others
Paul Eknes-Tucker, et al v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-11707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, BRIANNA BOE, JAMES ZOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR CULLMAN COUNTY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAURA BECKER, BILLY BURLEIGH, HELENA KERSCHNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION and ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
