Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Doctors Hospital of Augusta, LLC v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Labor Cabinet et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00206
Plaintiff: Doctors Hospital of Augusta, LLC
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Labor Cabinet and Marcus Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Missouri, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-17111
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. Chris Koster, Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, ex rel. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, Attorney General and others
Defendant - Appellee: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA EGG FARMERS
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF UTAH, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
John Russell, et al v. Allison Lundergan-Grimes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6262
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN RUSSELL and CAMPBELL COUNTY AUTO BODY, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: ALLISON LUNDERGAN-GRIMES, Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, DAVID CROSS, Member State Board of Elections, JOHN HAMPTON, Member State Board of Elections and others
Defendant: JACK SNODGRASS, Member of the Campbell County Board of Elections, et al.
State of Missouri, et al v. Harris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00341
Defendant: Kamala D. Harris and Karen Ross
Plaintiff: State of Missouri , State of Nebraska , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00093
Plaintiff: Beverly J. Cox
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Jack Conway and Department of Corrections Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. MILBY
as 3:2010cv00052
Defendant: LARRY MILBY
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Villaspring Health Care Center, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services et al
as 3:2007cv00070
Plaintiff: Villaspring Health Care Center, Inc., Villaspring Health Care Center, Inc., Villaspring Health Care Center, Inc. and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson Controls, Inc. et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance and Administration Cabinet et al
as 3:2007cv00065
Plaintiff: Johnson Controls, Inc., Johnson Controls, Inc., Johnson Controls, Inc. and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance and Administration Cabinet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Marathon Petroleum Company, LLC et al
as 3:2007cv00030
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Marathon Petroleum Company, LLC, Marathon Petroleum Company, LLC, Marathon Petroleum Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
AT&T, et al v. Rudolph, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-5424
Plaintiff - Appellee: AT&T CORPORATION, dba AT&T, AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL STATES, INC., dba AT&T, TCG OHIO, dba AT&T and others
Defendant - Appellant: ROBBIE RUDOLPH, Secretary of the Finance and Administration Cabinet, Commonwealth of Kentucky, in his official capacity and MARK TREESH, Commissioner of the Department ofRevenue, Commonwealth of Kentucky, in his official capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?