Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Lambert v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 4:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lambert
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GC Services Limited Partnership v. 1021018 Alberta Ltd.
as 4:2010cv04059
Plaintiff:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Defendant:
1021018 Alberta Ltd.
Counter_claimant:
1021018 Alberta Ltd.
Counter_defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roldan v. GC Services Limited Partnership - Delaware
as 6:2010cv01468
Plaintiff:
Manuel Roldan, Jr.
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership - Delaware
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marianne L. Franklin et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2010cv00961
Defendant:
Doe's 1-5, GC Services Limited Partnership and JPMorgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Marianne L. Franklin, Robert G. Franklin and Kap CA, LLC
Garcia v. GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware
as 2:2009cv14294
Plaintiff:
Diana Garcia
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware and GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nelson v. GC Services
as 3:2008cv00444
Plaintiff:
Madelyn Nelson and Madelyn Nelson
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 2:2007cv01965
Plaintiff:
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership, GC Services Limited Partnership and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Gibson v. Spellings et al
as 2:2007cv00189
Plaintiff:
Joyce D Gibson
Defendant:
Margaret Spellings, United States Department of Education, GC Services Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
