Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Nautilus Insurance Company v. 93 Lounge Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01029
Defendant:
93 Lounge Inc., Charles Amado, Jr., Eileen P. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Garcia et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Elvia Garcia , Marylu Garcia , Agustin Garcia and others
Defendant:
Lewis Marshall Bailey, IV, Lewis Marshall Bailey, III and Jesus Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Rodriguez et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv20758
Plaintiff:
Gloria Rodriguez , Luis Rodriguez and Romer Management Corp.
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bridgewater Associates, Limited Partnership v. Rodriguez
as 3:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
Bridgewater Associates, Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Luis Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Citibank Global Markets, Inc. v. Luis Fernandez-Ramirez, et al
as 08-1739
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., d/b/a Smith Barney Inc.
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
ALFER REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., CASEN, INC., CENTER COMMERCIAL & REALTY CORP. and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
JUAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ
Citibank Global Markets, Inc. v. Fernandez-Ramirez, et al
as 08-1533
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., d/b/a Smith Barney Inc.
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
JUAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
ALFER REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., CASEN, INC., CENTER COMMERCIAL & REALTY CORP. and others
Daniels v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 1:2007cv00889
Plaintiff:
Dessie Daniels
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds, State Farm Lloyds, State Farm Lloyds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
