Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Steve Rector v. E & E Foods, et al
as 13-35424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE RECTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
E & E FOODS, F/V BEAGLE, LLC, in personam and F/V BEAGLE, Official Number 259833, her engines, machinery, appurtenances and cargo, in rem
Chartis Specialty Insurance Company v. APCO Construction et al
as 2:2013cv00361
Defendant:
APCO Construction, Century Steel, Inc., Custom Ornamental Iron, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chartis Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
McAllister v. E & E Foods et al
as 2:2012cv01541
Plaintiff:
Fox McAllister
Defendant:
E & E Foods , F/V Beagle, LLC and F/V Beagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Rector v. E & E Foods et al
as 2:2012cv01527
Plaintiff:
Steve Rector
Defendant:
E & E Foods , Beagle F/V, LLC and Beagle F/V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
E. E. Cruz & Company, Inc. v. Imperial Iron Workers, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05314
Plaintiff:
E. E. Cruz & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Imperial Iron Workers, Inc., Axis Surplus Insurance Co., John Doe Nos. 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al
as 1:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
J. Tedd Smith and E&E Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. E&E Co., Ltd.
as 1:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
J. Tedd Smith
Defendant:
E&E Co., Ltd.
Counter_claimant:
E&E Co., Ltd.
Counter_defendant:
J. Tedd Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Defendant:
J. Tedd Smith and E&E Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
SDB Trade International, L.P. v. E & E Group, L.L.C.
as 11-20281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SDB TRADE INTERNATIONAL LP
Defendant - Appellant:
E & E GROUP LLC, doing business as E & E Steel Trading
Inotec Inc v. E&E Co Ltd
as 8:2010cv01423
Plaintiff:
Inotec Inc
Defendant:
E&E Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
