Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Harris v. Dimon et al
as 2:2013cv02414
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Harris
Defendant:
James Dimon, James Bell, Crandall C Bowles and others
Movant:
Jeffrey Shlosberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colin v. Dimon et al
as 5:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Sullivan Colin
Defendant:
James Dimon , Douglas L. Braunstein , Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adams v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 13-1154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VASHONE L. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, CAROL YOUNG, JAMES DIMON and others
Espinoza v. Dimon et al
as 1:2013cv02358
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Espinoza
Defendant:
James Dimon , Douglas L. Braunstein , Michael J. Cavanagh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Ravicher v. Moynihan et al
as 1:2013cv01665
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ravicher
Defendant:
Brian T. Moynihan, Bruce R. Thompson, Neil A. Cotty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Reeves v. Richards et al
as 0:2012cv62087
Plaintiff:
Cleveland J. Reeves
Defendant:
Amy L. Richards and James Dimon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Adams v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Vashone L. Adams
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Carol (I) Young, Carol Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Dimon et al
as 1:2011cv06231
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
James Dimon, James S. Crown, William H. Gray, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. Dimon et al
as 7:2011cv05250
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pearson
Defendant:
James Dimon, Eric Holder and Robert W. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garber v. Dimon, et al
as 1:2008cv00975
Plaintiff:
Robert Garber
Defendant:
James Dimon,, Ina R. Drew, Jay Mandelbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
