Cases 31 - 40 of 703
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America, et al v. M/V One Apus, et al
as 1:2022cv08233
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America,, Affliated FM Insurance Company, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty and others
Defendant:
One, BDP Transport Inc., HMM and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Danmar Lines
Cross Claimant:
Transpac Cargoline, New Chain Logistics Co Ltd, Samsung SDS Co Ltd and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
M/V ONE APUS, IMO no. 9806079, including its engines, boilers, tackle, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant:
Orient Overseas Container Line, M/V One Apus in rem, ECU Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. et al v. Shenzhen Eva Mould Manufacturing Company Limited et al
as 1:2022cv08115
Plaintiff:
UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd., UPS Ocean Freight Services, Inc. and UPS SCS (China) Ltd.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Eva Mould Manufacturing Company Limited, The Chamberlain Group Limited, Freig Carillo Forwarding and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
Hawkeye Gold, LLC v. China National Materials
as 22-2800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hawkeye Gold, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
China National Materials Industry Import and Export Corporation, doing business as Sinoma
UPS Asia Group PTE. Ltd. et al v. Solaray, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06990
Debtor:
Tyco Electronics Mexico S De RL De CV
Plaintiff:
UPS Asia Group PTE. Ltd., UPS Ocean Freight Services, Inc., UPS SCS (China) Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Solaray, LLC, Dongguan Grand Fly Display Ltd, The Hanover Insurance Company a/s/o Progressive Dynamics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
OEC Group (NY) Inc. v. China Cargo Airlines LTD
as 1:2022cv04202
Plaintiff:
OEC GROUP (NY) Inc.
Defendant:
CHINA CARGO AIRLINES LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. American Commercial Transport, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06386
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
American Commercial Transport, Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd. and Pronto Great China Corp
Defendant:
Rohlig USA LLC, Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc., Translink Shipping Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Hyundai Merchant Marine CO Ltd
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Shine Shipping Ltd, Shine International Transportation (Hong Kong) Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
SSS Westheimer Marketplace, LLC et al v. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (USA) NA
as 4:2022cv02085
Plaintiff:
SSS Westheimer Marketplace, LLC and SKJ Westheimer Marketplace, LLC, SSS Westheimer Marketplace, LLC and SKJ Westheimer Marketplace, LLC
Defendant:
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (USA) NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Chubb European Group SE v. Lead Global Logistics, Limited et al
as 1:2022cv05340
Plaintiff:
Chubb European Group SE
Defendant:
Lead Global Logistics, Limited, Casa China Limited and Does 1 through 10, inclusive,
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crosswinds International Inc. v. HSIN Silk Road Shipping LTD. et al
as 2:2022cv04166
Plaintiff:
Crosswinds International Inc.
Defendant:
HSIN Silk Road Shipping LTD., HSIN Silk Road Shipping USA, Inc. and A Cargo of Commercial Goods Transported from Ningbo, China to Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
D.A. Direct, Inc. v. China Int'l Freight Co., Ltd.
as 1:2022cv04609
Plaintiff:
D.A. Direct, Inc.
Defendant:
China Int'l Freight Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
