Cases 51 - 57 of 57
State of Utah v. Abbot Laboratories et al
as 2:2007cv00899
Plaintiff:
State of Utah and State of Utah
Defendant:
Abbot Laboratories, Astrazeneca, Bayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
In Re: State of Iowa Cases
as 1:2007cv12141
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, State of Iowa, State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alpharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline v. Abbott Laboratories
as 3:2007cv05702
Plaintiff:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline v. Abbott Laboratories
as 4:2007cv05702
Plaintiff:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of Iowa v Abbott Laboratories Inc., et al.,
as 4:2007cv00461
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories (Incorporated), Agouron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Alpharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Trass v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02428
Plaintiff:
Lula Trass
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America et al v. Lufthansa Cargo A.G. et al
as 1:2007cv05576
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America and GlaxoSmithKline
Defendant:
Lufthansa Cargo A.G., Exel GMBH, Exel Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1502 Warsaw Convention
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
