Cases 51 - 60 of 144
Apex Digital, Incorporated v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
as 12-3115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APEX DIGITAL, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
Charles Chatham, et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
as 12-3111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES CHATHAM, WILLIAM HURST, DAVID HAZARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
Dayton v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2012at01031
Plaintiff:
Judy A Dayton
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Holdings Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Penn-Star Insurance Company v. Justice et al
as 2:2012cv02153
Plaintiff:
Penn-Star Insurance Company
Defendant:
William Michael Justice, Sears Roebuck and Company , Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Riles v. Sears Roebuck & Co
as 3:2012cv00275
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Company and Sears Roebuck & Co
Plaintiff:
Retus Riles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Galvan v. Sears Holdings Management Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lizette Galvan
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Galvan v. Sears Holdings Management Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00444
Plaintiff:
Lizette Galvan
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopez, Alejandro v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 3:2011cv00728
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Lopez and Jacob Lazarz
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. , Sears Auto Center and Subsidiary of Sears Holdings Corporation (NASDAQ:SHLD)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bedard v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 4:2011cv01855
Plaintiff:
John Bedard
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co., Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and Citibank USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hazlewood v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 4:2011cv03448
Plaintiff:
James Hazlewood
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
