Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Asphalt Refining & Technology Company, LLC v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 1:2008cv01745
Plaintiff: Asphalt Refining & Technology Company, LLC
Defendant: Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
FALONE v. STINGFREE TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv00737
Plaintiff: THOMAS FALONE
Defendant: STINGFREE TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, STINGFREE SHOE COMPANY, UNBREAKABLE NATION COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
CYTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. et al v. CLEAN HARBORS, INC.
as 1:2008cv00220
Plaintiff: CYTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., ARKEMA INC., QUALITY CARRIERS, INC. and others
Defendant: CLEAN HARBORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Desert Dump Truck Rental, Inc. v. Macro-Z Technology Company et al
as 4:2007cv00251
Plaintiff: Desert Dump Truck Rental Incorporated
Defendant: Macro-Z Technology Company and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Counter Defendant: EMC Insurance Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
A & S Paving, Inc v. Larkor Construction Company, Inc., et al
as 4:2007cv00028
Defendant: Larkor Construction Company, Inc., Macro-Z Technology Company and Safeco Insurance
Plaintiff: A&S Paving Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
PMG, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin ID, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2002cv00539
Plaintiff: PMG, Inc.
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company and Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC
Counter_claimant: Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC and Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company
Counter_defendant: PMG, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company and Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant: Positech International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?