Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bastion Technologies, Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Space Systems International, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03496
Plaintiff:
Bastion Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Hamilton Sundstrand Space Systems International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation et al v. Aircraft Propeller Service, LLC
as 1:2019cv06472
Plaintiff:
RATIER-FIGEAC SAS and Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
Defendant:
AIRCRAFT PROPELLER SERVICE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belden Tools Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
as 1:2018cv02236
Defendant:
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
Plaintiff:
Belden Tools Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Chardam Gear Company, Inc. v Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
as 2:2018cv10377
Plaintiff:
Chardam Gear Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
TREADWELL CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
TREADWELL CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
City of Los Angeles v. North American Bus Industries Inc et al
as 2:2012cv09440
Plaintiff:
City of Los Angeles
Defendant:
Cummins Inc, Cummins Westfield Inc, Does and others
ICE Corporation v. Hamilton Sundstrand, et al
as 12-3103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ICE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION and RATIER-FIGEAC, S.A.S.
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation v. RDS Wire and Cable Inc
as 2:2012cv02868
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
Defendant:
RDS Wire and Cable Inc
ICE Corporation v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., et al
as 10-3328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ICE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION and RATIER-FIGEAC, S.A.S.
ICE Corporation v. Hamilton Sundstrand, et al
as 10-3116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ICE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION and RATIER-FIGEAC, S.A.S.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
