Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds et al v. National RailRoad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv04717
Counter Defendant:
AG De 1830 Compagnie Belge D'Assurances Generales Incendie Accidents Et Risques Divers SA, Accident & Casualty Co., Accident & Casualty Insurance Company Of Winterthur and others
Plaintiff:
AG De 1830 Compagnie Belge D'Assurances Generales Incendie Accidents Et Risques Divers SA, Accident & Casualty Co., Accident & Casualty Insurance Company Of Winterthur and others
Cross Defendant:
Allianz Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company and others
Defendant:
Allianz Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
National RailRoad Passenger Corporation
Cross Claimant:
National RailRoad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv00904
Plaintiff:
HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. and HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
EnergyNorth Natural v. Century Indemnity, et al
as 05-2149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ENERGYNORTH NATURAL ENERGYNORTH NATURAL GAS, INC., Successor-in-Interest to Gas Service, Inc.
Defendant:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN RE-INSURANC AMERICAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, successor to CIGNA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, formerly known as CALIFORNIA UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, and as successor to CCI INSURANCE COMPANY, successor to INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, successor to INDEMNITY INSURANCE C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
