Cases 1 - 7 of 7
451 Marketing, LLC v. Namco, LLC
as 3:2017cv01927
Plaintiff:
451 Marketing, LLC
Defendant:
Namco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heide Kurtz v. LMIC, et al
as 14-55931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEIDE KURTZ, solely in her capacity as Chapter 7th Trustee for the Estate of Namco Financial Exchange Corp.
Defendant - Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts Corporation, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York Corporation, AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation and others
Perez-Rubero v. NAMCO Cybertainment, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02234
Plaintiff:
Alberto Perez-Rubero
Defendant:
NAMCO Cybertainment, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAINSOURCE BANK v. NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
MAINSOURCE BANK
Defendant:
NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC. and ALAN L. ROLFES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
Georgia Flattop Partners LLC v. Gray et al
as 1:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
Georgia Flattop Partners LLC
Defendant:
John H. Gray, II and Green Mountain Management LLC
Intervenor:
NAMCO Waste Management of Alabama LLC
Counter Defendant:
NAMCO Waste Management of Alabama LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Paragon Metals International, Inc. v. Namco Metals Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00457
Plaintiff:
Paragon Metals International, Inc., Paragon Metals International, Inc. and Paragon Metals International, Inc.
Defendant:
Namco Metals Management, Inc. and Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Namco Metals Management, Inc. v. Paragon Metals International, Inc.
as 2:2007cv01361
Plaintiff:
Namco Metals Management, Inc. and Namco Metals Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Paragon Metals International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
