Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Livingston v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Jean T. Livingston
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Michael Burke and others
U.S. Bank National Association v. PM Investments and Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02781
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
PM Investments and Consulting, Inc., Moore Healthcare Group, Premier Urgent Care, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U S Bank National Association v. P M Investments & Consulting Inc et al
as 6:2021cv02781
Plaintiff:
U S Bank National Association
Defendant:
P M Investments & Consulting Inc, Moore Healthcare Group, Premier Urgent Care L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delivery.com Franchising, LLC v. Moore
as 1:2020cv20766
Defendant:
Patrick Moore
Plaintiff:
Delivery.Com Franchising, LLC d/b/a Delivery.Com and Delivery.com Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eder v. Northern Arizona Consolidated Fire District #1 et al
as 3:2019cv08101
Defendant:
Mike Collins, Patrick Moore, Jake Rhoades and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Eder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Moore et al
as 4:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Peter Moore, Cecilia Moore, Robert G Rambaldi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST ET AL. V. EXELIS INC. ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BALLWEBER, JESSE MALLINGER, THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST and others
Defendant:
HERMAN E. BULLS, EXELIS, INC., RALPH HAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
McGILL v. HAKE et al
as 1:2015cv00217
Defendant:
HERMAN E. BULLS, RALPH HAKE, JOHN J. HAMRE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM McGILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
