Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LTE RAIL SERVICES INC OHIO COMMERCE CENTER v. CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
LTE RAIL SERVICES INC OHIO COMMERCE CENTER
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Insurance, Inc. v. CSX Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv06287
Defendant:
Savage Industrial Rail Services, Inc., Savage Services Corp., CSX Transportation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canadian National Railway Company et al v. Railmark Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00157
Plaintiff:
Algoma Central Railway, Inc. and Canadian National Railway Company
Defendant:
Railmark Track Works, Inc., Railmark Holdings, Inc., Railmark Rail Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turbo-Mex Refacciones, Mantenimiento Y Seguridad Industrial, S.A. De C.V. v. C&D Rail Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10838
Plaintiff:
Turbo-Mex Refacciones, Mantenimiento Y Seguridad Industrial, S.A. De C.V.
Defendant:
C&D Rail Services Inc. and Cesar E Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Polivka International Company, Inc. v. Quality Rail Service, Inc.
as 4:2013cv01746
Plaintiff:
Polivka International Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Quality Rail Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
California Northern Railroad C v. Gunderson Rail Services LLC
as 13-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GUNDERSON RAIL SERVICES LLC, formerly known as GUNDERSON RAIL SERVICES, INC.
PAULSBORO REFINING COMPANY LLC v. SMS RAIL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2012cv02828
Plaintiff:
PAULSBORO REFINING COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
SMS RAIL SERVICE, INC.
Counter_claimant:
SMS RAIL SERVICE, INC.
Counter_defendant:
PAULSBORO REFINING COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
