Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Chanel, Inc. v. 17901-9010 et al
as 0:2018cv60415
Defendant:
D9xzkska5x, Dushahnson, Brooke H Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Patagonia, Inc. v. Chelsea International Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08030
Defendant:
CAC International Group, Chelsea International Inc. and Tramever Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patagonia, Inc.
Chelsea Briche v. American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, Inc.
as 2:2016cv04672
Defendant:
American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Briche
Design Basics, LLC v. Chelsea Lumber Company et al
as 2:2014cv10114
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC
Defendant:
Chelsea Lumber Company and Matthew Hagood
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Johnson v. Myelin Productions
as 1:2012cv01359
Plaintiff:
Larry Elevtherios Johnson
Defendant:
Myelin Productions, Axum21st Group Global, Richard Vaz and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Select Retrieval, LLC v. ABT Electronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03752
Plaintiff:
Select Retrieval, LLC
Defendant:
ABT Electronics, Inc., Ace Hardware Corp., Action Village, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Design Basics, L.L.C. v. Chelsea Lumber Company et al
as 4:2011cv10854
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Chelsea Lumber Company and Matthew Hagood
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00683
Plaintiff:
Kelora Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation, OfficeMax Inc., Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Nike, Inc. v. Travis Silk et al
as 2:2009cv04768
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc. and Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
Travis Silk, Chelsea Silk and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. Van Ornum
as 4:2008cv04205
Plaintiff:
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Capitol Records LLC, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant:
Chelsea Van Ornum
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
