Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Teleconference Systems LLC v. Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv05895
Plaintiff: Teleconference Systems LLC, Teleconference Systems LLC and Teleconference Systems LLC
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc., Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc., HSBC USA Inc. and others
Intervenor: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 0:2009cv00999
Plaintiff: Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. and Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.
Defendant: The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Teleconference Systems LLC v. Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00200
Plaintiff: Teleconference Systems LLC
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc., HSBC USA Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Proctor & Gamble Company et al v. Sun Pharma Global Inc.
as 1:2009cv00061
Plaintiff: Proctor & Gamble Company and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
Defendant: Sun Pharma Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Catanzaro v. Proctor & Gamble Co.
as 3:2008cv02231
Plaintiff: David Catanzaro
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Proctor & Gamble Co. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00627
Plaintiff: Proctor & Gamble Co. and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Playtex Products, Inc. v. Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2008cv03417
Plaintiff: Playtex Products, Inc., Playtex Products, Inc. and Playtex Products, Inc.
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY v. ASHER, D.D.S., M.S.
as 2:2007cv04215
Plaintiff: THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY
Defendant: RANDALL S. ASHER, D.D.S., M.S.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
HEMPHILL v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv01236
Plaintiff: ALLEGRA D. HEMPHILL
Defendant: KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION and PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Asher v. Glaxosmithkline et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00339
Plaintiff: Randall S. Asher and Randall S. Asher
Defendant: Glaxosmithkline, Proctor & Gamble Company, The, Proctor & Gamble Company, The and others
Counter Claimant: Proctor & Gamble Company, The, Proctor & Gamble Company, The, Proctor & Gamble Company, The and others
Counter Defendant: Randall S. Asher and Randall S. Asher
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0001 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?