Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 12,832
Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd.
as 24-1885
Plaintiff: ORANGE ELECTRONIC CO. LTD.
Defendant: AUTEL INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CORP., LTD.
SemiLED Innovations LLC v. Visual Comfort of America LLC
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff: SemiLED Innovations LLC
Defendant: Visual Comfort of America LLC doing business as Visual Comfort & Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
TM CO. v. The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv22046
Plaintiff: TM CO.
Defendant: The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Shenzhen JianYuanDa Mirror Technology Co., Ltd. v. The Entities and Individuals Identified in Annex A
as 1:2024cv04379
Plaintiff: Shenzhen JianYuanDa Mirror Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant: The Entities and Individuals Identified in Annex A
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BuDhaGirl LLC v. Shenzhen Jiexinwei Electronic Technology Co Ltd et al
as 3:2024cv01300
Plaintiff: BuDhaGirl LLC
Defendant: Shenzhen Jiexinwei Electronic Technology Co Ltd doing business as YBMYCM Jewelry and Zhang Weixan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Suresh v. Bellet Construction Co., Inc.
as 1:2024cv04058
Plaintiff: Ajay Suresh
Defendant: Bellet Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd.
as 24-1876
Plaintiff: ORANGE ELECTRONIC CO. LTD.
Defendant: AUTEL INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CORP., LTD.
Morling v. UCP International Co., Ltd.
as 1:2024cv04081
Plaintiff: Katharine Morling
Defendant: UCP International Co., Ltd. a Hong Kong Company doing business as UCP Group
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited v. ppragmatic-play.asia et al
as 2:2024cv01272
Plaintiff: Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited
Defendant: ppragmatic-play.asia, pragmatic-play.games, pragmaticplay.academy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chengdu Ruihan Yongtai Trading Co., Ltd. et al v. Aaron Chien et al
as 2:2024cv04379
Plaintiff: Chengdu Ruihan Yongtai Trading Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou Chonger Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guigang Tianshi Trading Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Aaron Chien, Te-Ju Chien, Hsin-Yi Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?