Intellectual Property Cases filed in Delaware matching "Twitter"
Cases 31 - 40 of 561
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00410
Plaintiff: Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Defendant: Eunice City Court, Ville Platte City Court, City of Ville Platte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Frazier, Jr. et al v. X Corp et al
as 1:2024cv02135
Petitioner: Burgious Frazier, Yosub Kim, Wayne Krug and others
Respondent: X Corp f/k/a Twitter, Inc, X Holdings Corp f/k/a X Holdings I, INC., X Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate
Abadi v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01897
Defendant: X Corp., Eric Leroy Adams, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Aaron Abadi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Agrawal et al v. Musk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01304
Defendant: X Corp., Elon Musk, Twitter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Parag Agrawal, Ned Segal, Vijaya Gadde and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Magdalina Kalincheva v. Jews and Non-human hybrid Evil Jews Blacks et al
as 2:2024mc00033
Plaintiff: Magdalina Kalincheva, Jesse Neubarth and Jeffrey Neubarth
Cross Defendant: Jews and Non-human hybrid Evil Jews Blacks, UA Valentyna and Child22A Lesovitskaya, 10 RICO Liza and others
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court et al
as 2:2024cv00417
Plaintiff: Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Defendant: Eunice City Court, Ville Platte City Court, City of Ville Platte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Berkery v. Twitter, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04065
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sifuentes v. Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff: David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant: Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC. v. Bonta
as 24-271
Plaintiff / Appellant: X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Doe 1, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-177
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant / Appellee: TWITTER, INC. and X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?