Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Aquila Innovations, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
Aquila Innovations, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100
Aquila Investment Group v. Nucleus Enterprises, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Aquila Investment Group
Defendant:
Nucleus Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Solera Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv03461
Plaintiff:
Solera Holdings, Inc. and Tony Aquila
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Clockwork IP, LLC et al v. Clearview Plumbing & Heating, Ltd. et al
as 4:2014cv01618
Plaintiff:
Clockwork IP, LLC , Airtime, LLC and Aquila Investment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Giraffe Corporation and Clearview Plumbing & Heating, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. American International Group Inc
as 2:2007cv02192
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant:
American International Group Inc, AIG Retirement Services Inc, 21st Century Insurance Group and others
Counter Claimant:
DHL Holdings (USA) Inc, DHL Holdings (USA) Inc, DHL Holdings (USA) Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tesco Corporation v. Fluid Design Solutions Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00435
Plaintiff:
Tesco Corporation, Tesco Corporation and Tesco Corporation
Defendant:
Fluid Design Solutions Inc, Fluid Design Solutions Inc, Fluid Design Solutions Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Fluid Design Solutions Inc
Counter Defendant:
Tesco Corporation
Mediator:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
