Cases 1 - 9 of 9
National Marketing Resources, LLC v. Bowers
as 4:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
National Marketing Resources, LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Bowers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Beachbody LLC v. Andre et al
as 2:2011cv10232
Defendant:
Barrera Andre, Richard Bao, Brandon Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Beachbody LLC
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America v. National Marketing Source, LLC
as 0:2011cv62438
Plaintiff:
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America
Defendant:
National Marketing Source, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
National Marketing Inc et al v. Greg Cynaumon et al
as 8:2010cv01057
Plaintiff:
Cortislim International LLC and National Marketing Inc
Defendant:
Greg Cynaumon and DOES
National Marketing, Inc. et al v. Fivecare.com et al
as 2:2010cv03696
Plaintiff:
Cortislim International, LLC and National Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Fivecare.com and Danny Nguyen
National Marketing, Inc. et al v. Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv03700
Plaintiff:
Cortislim International, LLC and National Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Does and Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp.
National Marketing, Inc v. Window Rock Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv01299
Plaintiff:
National Marketing, Inc
Defendant:
Window Rock Enterprises, Inc., Stephen F Cheng and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
We're Ready to Assemble, Inc. v. Brenner Associates, Inc., et al
as 5:2007cv00396
Plaintiff:
We're Ready to Assemble, Inc. d/b/a IMPACT Resource Group
Defendant:
Brenner Associates Inc., d/b/a National Marketing Services and National Assembly Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Asset Marketing v. Gagnon, et al
as 07-55217
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
ASSET MARKETING SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
MISTER COMPUTER and NATIONAL MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
KEVIN GAGNON, d/b/a MISTER COMPUTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
