Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Juul Labs Inc. v. P T Investment Group, Inc.
as 3:2020cv03976
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs Inc.
Defendant:
P T Investment Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
BOIGRIS v. EWC P&T, LLC
as 1:2019cv21148
Defendant:
EWC P&T, LLC
Plaintiff:
BRYAN BOIGRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pynk Hilite, LLC v. EWC P&T, LLC
as 1:2017cv00107
Defendant:
EWC P&T, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pynk Hilite, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
EWC P&T, LLC et al v. NV WAX CENTER LLC et al
as 3:2016cv05032
Plaintiff:
EWC P&T, LLC and EWC FRANCHISE, LLC
Defendant:
NV WAX CENTER LLC, BETH HAZLEWOOD and AMY HAZLEWOOD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
EWC P&T, LLC v. Benefit Cosmetics, LLC
as 0:2016cv61847
Plaintiff:
EWC P&T, LLC
Defendant:
Benefit Cosmetics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
EWC P&T, LLC v. Doe 1 d/b/a "EXQUISITEPRODUCTS2016" et al
as 0:2016cv60643
Plaintiff:
EWC P&T, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
EWC P&T, LLC v. Stript Wax Bar LLC et al
as 0:2013cv60966
Plaintiff:
EWC P&T, LLC
Defendant:
Stript Wax Bar LLC and Katherine Goldman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
EWC P&T, Inc. v. Serenity Wax, LLC et al
as 0:2011cv61958
Plaintiff:
EWC P&T, Inc.
Defendant:
Serenity Wax, LLC, David Nydam and Michael Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Miles v. Houston et al
as 3:2007cv00508
Plaintiff:
Melody Miles
Defendant:
P. T. Houston, Greg Humphrey, Steve Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
P T Progressive Trading et al v. Creative Zone Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
P T Progressive Trading and Steven H Balanchi
Defendant:
Creative Zone Enterprises LLC and Does
Counter Claimant:
Creative Zone Enterprises LLC
Counter Defendant:
P T Progressive Trading and Steven H Balanchi
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
