Cases 91 - 100 of 1,348
Pearson, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schuh v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv03286
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Schuh
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Stripling v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Stripling
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peoples v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Kevin Peoples
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wells v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Wells
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NORMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NORMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Enderton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Enderton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Trotter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00952
Plaintiff:
Kevin Shontez Trotter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marquette v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv03029
Plaintiff:
Kevin Marquette
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
Kevin B Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
