Cases 51 - 60 of 6,121
Chamberlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
William E. Chamberlin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Keeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kate Vanover v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KATE E. VANOVER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Hughes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Farrah E. Hughes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HEFFELFINGER v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
DARLENE E HEFFELFINGER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grandits v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Joshua E Grandits
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walter Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-5080
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. BRADSHAW
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Byrd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Byrd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Worstell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bron E. Worstell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Paul E. King
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
