Cases 61 - 70 of 6,121
Kate Vanover v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KATE E. VANOVER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Ruth E. Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dayton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Dayton, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Baun v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Baun
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jessica E. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Touhey v. Social Security
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Chase E. Touhey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Keeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Keeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HEFFELFINGER v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
DARLENE E HEFFELFINGER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Worstell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bron E. Worstell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chmiel v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Mark E Chmiel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
