Cases 1 - 10 of 1,851
Murdoch v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Mark H Murdoch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ranaghan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03538
Plaintiff:
Mark Ranaghan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50163
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seniuk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Mark Seniuk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CAMPBELL, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04791
Plaintiff:
MARK J CAMPBELL, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HIGGINBOTHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04616
Plaintiff:
MARK HIGGINBOTHAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fidler v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Mark William Fidler, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mark Alan Woodend v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Woodend
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05252
Plaintiff:
Mark C Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
