Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gonzales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
Anita R. Gonzales
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jennifer Gonzales v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-3135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER R. GONZALES
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Gonzales v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01982
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Gonzales
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzales v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Gonzales
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzales v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00543
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Gonzales
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzales v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00205
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Gonzales
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gonzales v. Astrue
as 12-2166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDE R. GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Gonzales v.Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jude R Gonzales
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GONZALES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv03735
Plaintiff:
THOMAS R. GONZALES
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Achilles v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Eric A Achilles
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Catherine Hanaway and Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
