Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Revi v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03958
Plaintiff:
Yenaury Revi
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Revis on behalf of Q.T.N., a minor v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Teonna Revis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Revis, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv03694
Plaintiff:
Bruce Revis, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Revi v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2020cv02351
Defendant:
Alexander G. Levine and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Yenaury Revi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Revy v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01996
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kristen A Revy
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Revy v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01888
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kristen A Revy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Revi v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv08521
Plaintiff:
Yenaury Revi
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Revis v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Glenwood Earl Revis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Revis v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Glenwood Earl Revis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Revis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv01017
Plaintiff:
Bryan Shane Revis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
