Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Rawling v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Angela Rawling
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rawls v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Steven Rawls
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rawls v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2023cv81403
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Rawls
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rawlings v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv04065
Plaintiff:
Alicia Jean Rawlings
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RAWLS v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 9:2021cv80333
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Rawls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Rawls v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv05150
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Embry Rawls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rawls v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv04180
Plaintiff:
Sheila Rawls
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAWLS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv09305
Plaintiff:
TANYA RAWLS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Jana D. Rawling v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv01098
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jana D. Rawling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rawls v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01810
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Victoria Rawls
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
