Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Castro v. USA
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Castro v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Castro & Co LLC v Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
as 3:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Castro & Co LLC , Andrew D Blackwood , Ka Chun and others
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
ONEWEST BANK, N.A. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00513
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , IDA N. JOHNSON, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS and others
Plaintiff:
ONEWEST BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Grand Manor Health Realted Facility, Inc. v. Koskinen et al
as 1:2014cv10130
Plaintiff:
Grand Manor Health Realted Facility, Inc.
Defendant:
John Koskinen , Internal Revenue Service , Julian Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Alvarez Castro et al
as 3:2014cv01576
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Humberto Alvarez-Castro and Puerto Rico Treasury Department
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Theodoro H Castro
as 2:2011cv01121
Respondent:
Theodoro H Castro
Petitioner:
United States of America
United States of America v. Castro
as 1:2010mi00172
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eliseo Castro
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
n v. USA, et al
as 09-17426
Counter-claimant:
STEVE CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third-party-defendant - Appellant:
SHIRLEY J. VEATCH
Steve Castro v. USA, et al
as 09-17427
Plaintiff-counter-claimant - Appellant:
STEVE CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third-party-defendant:
SHIRLEY J. VEATCH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
