Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Fealy v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
John Robert Fealy
Defendant:
United States of America, Department Of The Treasury, Internal Revenue Service doing business as Elain Dean Curry for Kristina L. Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Noles v. United States of America et al (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
James D. Noles, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Deputy Assistant Attorney General doing business as David A. Hubbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Aaron I. Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Marco Frausto v. Daniel Murray, et al
as 17-56586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO A. FRAUSTO
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL MURRAY, Auditor, in his individual and official capacity, LINDA KING, Supervisor, in her individual and official capacity, JACOB LEW, Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, in his official capacity and others
Bret Ogilvie, et al v. Carron Cobb, et al
as 09-15631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRET W. OGILVIE and MERRY C. OGILVIE
Defendant - Appellee:
CARRON COBB, Manager, KLAICH ANIMAL HOSPITAL LTD, LORI HARRIS, Revenue Officer and others
Bret Ogilvie, et al v. Carron Cobb, et al
as 08-17280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRET W. OGILVIE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERRY C. OGILVIE
Defendant:
CARRON COBB, Manager, KLAICH ANIMAL HOSPITAL LTD, LORI HARRIS, Revenue Officer and others
Bret Ogilvie, et al v. Carron Cobb, et al
as 08-16530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRET W. OGILVIE and MERRY C. OGILVIE
Defendant - Appellee:
CARRON COBB, Manager, KLAICH ANIMAL HOSPITAL LTD, LORI HARRIS, Revenue Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
