Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Physicians Online, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01151
Defendant:
Physicians Online, Inc., James Howick and gary sandoval
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
University Physician Group v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv13346
Plaintiff:
University Physician Group
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Shahan v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Rodney Shahan
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service , Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Banyan Finance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
United States of America v. Maddi et al
as 1:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joseph L. Maddi, Joseph L. Maddi Physician, P,C, Healthnow New York Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Sykes v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sykes
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service , Department of Human Services , OU Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Physicians Health Network v. USA
as 09-2242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHYSICIANS HEALTH NETWORK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Aultman Hospital et al
as 5:2009cv02115
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aultman Hospital, Canton Aultman Emergency Physicians, Inc., Doctors Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
Physicians Health Network v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
Physicians Health Network
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States v. Hartmann et al
as 0:2008cv05747
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Warren Hartmann, Carolyn Hartman, University of Minnesota Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340 IRS: Custom Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
