Cases 1 - 10 of 100
USA v. Estate of Richard T. Cole, Deceased, et al
as 26-1509
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ESTATE OF RICHARD T. COLE, Deceased and ROBERT W. BURLAND, JR.
US v. Hatch
as 26-1283
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
RICHARD H. HATCH, JR., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., d/b/a Nominee for Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc., MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA, INC., d/b/a Lenders Network and others
USA v. Doron Kramer, et al
as 26-1190
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DORON KRAMER, individually, as Trustee of the Kramer Christian Trust and as defacto personal representative and/or potential heir and/or distributee of the Estate of Richard Kramer, aka Donald Kramer, OAKLAND COUNTY, MI TREASURER and STATE OF MICHIGAN
Skelhorn v. United State of America
as 0:2025cv62630
Plaintiff:
Richard Skelhorn
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
US v. Hatch, et al
as 25-2111
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CITIZENS BANK, N.A., f/k/a Citizens Bank of Rhode Island, MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA, INC., d/b/a Lenders Network and others
United States of America v. Richard A. Valdez
as 2:2025cv08855
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
Richard A Valdez
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
United States of America v. Cullifer
as 9:2025cv81111
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard H. Cullifer
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Ohendalski v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv03316
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Ohendalski
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
United States of America v. Petrosa et al
as 1:2025cv05189
Defendant:
Richard Petrosa and Melissa Petrosa
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
