Cases 101 - 110 of 1,587
Gerow v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2022cv02977
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, City of Phoenix, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Jackson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 4:2022cv13150
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bradley Lane, Merik Whipple and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Guz v. Silvergate Capital Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01968
Plaintiff:
Jacob Guz
Defendant:
Silvergate Capital Corporation, Alan J. Lane and Antonio Martino
United States of America v. Lane
as 22-3118
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Andrew Lane, AKA Joey Green
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re Silvergate Capital Corporation Securities Litigation
as 3:2022cv01936
Plaintiff:
Steven Rosa, Jacob Guz, John Thomas and others
Defendant:
Silvergate Capital Corporation, Alan J. Lane, Antonio Martino and others
Tom v. Atlantic Partners Realty Brevard, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv02217
Plaintiff:
David Tom
Defendant:
Atlantic Partners Realty Brevard, LLC a Domestic Limited Liability Company doing business as Keller Williams Realty Brevard and Paige Lane
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
US v. Croft
as 23-1200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY LANE CROFT
Dominick Alcantara et al v. United Furniture Industries, Inc. et al
as CAC/5:22-CV-02110
Plaintiff:
Dominick Alcantara and Mario Gonzalez
Defendant:
United Furniture Industries, Inc, United Furniture Industries, Inc., UFI California, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
