Cases 111 - 120 of 272
USA v. Michael E. Smith
as 16-6726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. SMITH
General Information Services, Inc. et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv03698
Plaintiff:
General Information Services, Inc. , Dexter Group Holdings, Inc. and Neno Research, Inc.
Defendant:
George E. Smith and WEBDATX INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
James Smith v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-4036
Petitioner:
James E. Smith
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Rose A. Carpenter et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:16-cv-07084
Plaintiff:
Rose A. Carpenter , Teresa A. Blair , Denise Boucher and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does 1-50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Northland Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02192
Plaintiff:
Dominicque E. Smith
Defendant:
Northland Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WAKED FARES et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv01730
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMED WAKED FARES , MOHAMED ABDO WAKED DARWICH , LUCIA TOUZARD ROMO and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. SMITH and OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Edwards v. General Motors, LLC
as NYS/1:14-cv-06924
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ishmail Sesay , Dolly Matthews , Dawn Wright and others
Respondent:
King & Spalding LLP
United States of America v. Smith
as 3:2016cv02415
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Trigo et al v Garcia-Padilla et al
as 3:2016cv02257
Plaintiff:
Dionisio Trigo-Gonzalez , Carmen Regina Suarez-Sein , Conjugal Partnership Trigo-Suarez and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Garcia-Padilla , Juan C. Zaragoza-Gomez , The Government Development Bank of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
