Cases 111 - 120 of 800
USA v. Naushad Khan
as 22-1906
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NAUSHAD KHAN
United States of America v. VOIP Terminator, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
VOIP Terminator, Inc., BLMarketing, Inc. and Muhammad Usman Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shaheryar Khan v. Kent Seton, et al
as 22-55366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAHERYAR KHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
KENT SETON, ADAM KRAEMER, EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION and others
Hanif Khan v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1300
Petitioner:
HANIF KHAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
MEHMOOD et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
SADIA MEHMOOD and IMRAN KHAN
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Bundoo Khan USA LLC v. Arrehman Arraheem Corporation
as 8:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Bundoo Khan USA LLC
Defendant:
Arrehman Arraheem Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. BERGER, D.C. et al
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
PETER BERGER, D.C., HAWTHORNE PAIN & SPINE CENTER, LLC, JON-PAUL DADAIAN, M.D., and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Khan v. Aspen Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Altaf Khan
Defendant:
Aspen Technology, Inc., Antonio Pietri, Jill Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
