Cases 111 - 120 of 142
Mayer v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv03401
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Clarence Mayer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Tkalych et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 1:2013cv06283
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Oleg Tkalych and Nataliya Trunova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeong v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 4:2013cv00637
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Na-Young Jeong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Perry v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED
as 4:2013cv00457
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephen Perry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In re: Webvention LLC ('294) Patent Litigation
as 1:2011md02294
Plaintiff:
Novartis Corporation, Furniture Brands International, Inc., HDM Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Webvention Holdings LLC , Webvention , Adidas America Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Landstar System, Inc. et al , Landstar System Holdings, Inc. , Landstar System, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Webvention LLC , 20-20 Icovia Inc., Marie Claire/Hearst and others
Patrick G Lum et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2011cv09751
Plaintiff:
Patrick G Lum and Michael A Mullin
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Mance v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 4:2011cv03717
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Mance
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
G Ray Kerciu v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2011cv03472
Plaintiff:
G Ray Kerciu
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Lau v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv01940
Plaintiff:
Don Lau
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
