Cases 121 - 130 of 1,595
Smith v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09808
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint Lane, Robert Farrell and others
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
CODER et al v. MOVING SERVICES CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv06567
Plaintiff:
WIMMER LANE CODER and RACHEL CODER MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MOVING SERVICES CORP., JOSEPH HANNOUCH and MOVING SERVICES CORP. doing business as Selective Van Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
O'Dell v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09212
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint A. Lane, Bob Farrell and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Lane County, Oregon
as 6:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Lane County, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
TANG et al v. CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., HARBIN PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP HOLDING CO., LTD., HARBIN PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP CO., LTD. and others
Not Classified By Court:
DANIEL S. SCHECTER, PHV MICHAEL J. REISS, PHV NICOLE H. SPRINZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Keita v. Konax LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06379
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Defendant:
Konax LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Favro
as 22-40684
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Travis Lane Favro
RAPOSA v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05896
Plaintiff:
EILEEN RAPOSA, MICHAEL L. RAFFO, TONY GUNDOLF and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, D/B/A AUDI OF AMERICA, INC., AUDI AG, A GERMAN CORPORATION, VOLKSWAGEN AG, A GERMAN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
