Cases 121 - 130 of 1,713
Medina De La Cruz v. Garland
as 22-1612
Petitioner:
JUAN ANEUDY MEDINA DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Medina Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1238
Petitioner:
MARIA DE LOS ANGELES MEDINA RODALES and XOCHITL GUADALUPE CERVANTES MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Mendez (Matos)
as 22-1561
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Mendez, Hector Santiago, Helbert Calo-Birriel, AKA Helbert Calo-Birreiel and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Samuel Matos
Valladares Medina, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1212
Petitioner:
GREGORIA VALLADARES MEDINA and LISVETH PERALTA VALLADARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medina-Morales v. US
as 22-1542
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS MEDINA-MORALES
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Whitener v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
NNEKA C. WHITENER
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Martha Medina-Malthes
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite et al v. City of Bainbridge Island et al
as 3:2022cv05491
Plaintiff:
Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite, Lee Rosenbaum, Janice Pyke and others
Defendant:
The City of Bainbridge Island, Kolby Medina, Morgan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jose Medina v. United Airlines, Inc
as 22-80058
Respondent:
JOSE MEDINA, as an individual and on behalf of all aggrieved employees
Petitioner:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC, a Delaware Corporation
USA v. Jonathan Medina
as 22-50143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN HERNANDEZ MEDINA
Medina Abrego, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1094
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EDGARDO MEDINA ABREGO and WILLIAM ANTONIO MEDINA REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
