Cases 131 - 140 of 4,559
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Walter Garcia-Magana v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3955
Petitioner:
WALTER TEODORO GARCIA-MAGANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Vasquez Lopez v. Garland
as 23-3667
Petitioner:
WALTER VASQUEZ LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Walter Himmelreich
as 23-3052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WALTER HIMMELREICH
Betschart, et al. v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-3573
Petitioner:
WALTER BETSCHART, JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA and others
Respondent:
PATRICK GARRETT, SHERIFF, Washington County Sheriff, in his official capacity and STATE OF OREGON
Maldonado-Magno, et al v. Garland
as 23-9604
Petitioner:
WALTER MALDONADO-MAGNO, ANDREA UCHUYPOMA-PALOMINO and LOAN MALDONADO-UCHUYPOMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Rooney v. Amaral et al
as 1:2023cv08570
Plaintiff:
Patrick Rooney
Defendant:
Walter D. Amaral, Doug Bewsher, Daniel Boncel and others
Betschart, et al. v. Washington County Circuit Court Judges, et al.
as 23-3560
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA, TYRIK DAWKINS and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
