Other Statutes Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 3,364
Cook v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as MN/0:23-CV-02700
Plaintiff: Cook and Robert Cook
Defendant: Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc. and others
Cook et al v. Wels Fargo Bank, N.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00240
Plaintiff: Lawrence W. Cook and Jane Rose Cook
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Mark Cook
as 23-2548
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MARK COOK
Douglas Hirano v. USDC-HI
as 23-70157
Not Classified By Court: In re: DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO, KATE MCCLORY, SAND ISLAND TREATMENT CENTER and others
Petitioner: DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
BAYUK et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01279
Plaintiff: DARRYL BAYUK, YAAKOB BEHOR, COOKE CNC SERVICES and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Riverside Rehab & Healthcare et al v. Theresa A. Eagleson
as 1:2023cv05104
Plaintiff: Riverside Rehab & Healthcare, Lakeside Rehab & Healthcare, Lake Cook Rehab & Healthcare and others
Defendant: Theresa A. Eagleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Julie Barfuss v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 23-80068
Petitioner: JULIE BARFUSS, RANDY FLOYD BARFUS, RUMER HENRY` and others
Respondent: LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETMASTER L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03921
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tajmere CookeIn re: Tajmere Cooke
as 23-8032
Petitioner: In re: TAJMERE COOKE
Tajmere CookeIn re: Tajmere Cooke
as 23-2175
Petitioner: In re: TAJMERE COOKE
Respondent: SCOTT HARRIS, Deputy Clerk and CLERK UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, Clerk's Office

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?