Other Statutes Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 5,335
Sanchez De La Roca v. Garland
as 23-2028
Petitioner: COSMEN SANCHEZ DE LA ROCA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 23-7886
Petitioner: EDGAR MARINO SANCHEZ and Marinito
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62274
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanchez-Sanchez v. Garland
as 23-7873
Petitioner: ANGEL VINICIO SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 23-3832
Plaintiff / Appellee: LEWIS STEWART
Defendant / Appellant: ROMEO ARANAS and FRANCISCO M. SANCHEZ
Defendant: CHERYL BURSON, S.L. CLARK, JAMES COX and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. MGM Affair, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01438
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: MGM Affair, LLC d/b/a Detour Domain, d/b/a Detour, and d/b/a Detour Domain Neighborhood Bar, Michael A. Sanchez and MGM Affair, LLC doing business as Detour Domain doing business as Detour doing business as Detour Domain Neighborhood Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01187
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Aguilar-Sanchez
as 23-50851
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Alejandro Aguilar-Sanchez
US v. Verdejo-Sanchez
as 23-1964
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: FELIX VERDEJO-SANCHEZ
Interested Party: EDWIN PRADO-GALARZA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?