Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Poppell et al v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00064
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, McKesson Drug Company, LLC, Richard D. Griffis, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: K.M.M., M.G., Patricia Haythorn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jane Doe J.L. et al v. University of Southern California et al
as 2:2018cv06115
Plaintiff: Jane Doe K.M., Betsayda Aceituno, Jane Doe S.A. and others
Defendant: University of Southern California, George Tyndall and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe A.T. et al v. University of Southern California et al
as 2:2018cv04940
Defendant: Board of Trustees of the University of Southern California, George Tyndall and University of Southern California
Plaintiff: Vanessa Carlisle, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
In Re Application of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018mc00124
Petitioner: In re Application of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
Respondent: A.T. Kearney, Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
Mattatall v. Wall
as 16-2472
Petitioner: STEPHEN R. MATTATALL
Respondent: A.T. WALL
Goettl, Victor et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as WIW/3:16-cv-00501
Plaintiff: Victor Goettl , Darden Bridgeforth & Sons , Bridgeforth Farms and others
Defendant: Syngenta AG , Crop Protection AG , Syngenta Corp. and others
Bresilla v. Wall
as 16-8014
Petitioner: ELYSEE BRESILLA
Respondent: A.T. WALL
Mattatall v. Wall
as 16-1262
Petitioner: STEPHEN R. MATTATALL
Respondent: A.T. WALL
Lynch v. Wall
as 16-1241
Petitioner: RAYMOND LYNCH
Respondent: A.T. WALL, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Miguel v. Wall
as 16-1183
Petitioner: JOHN S. MIGUEL
Respondent: A.T. WALL, Director of R.I. Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?