Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Larry Klayman v. Stephanie Deluca, et al
as 16-11822
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee: LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHANIE DELUCA
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant: HEWITT SHAW, SUZANNE JAMBE, JAMES ROLLINSON and others
Larry Klayman v. Stephanie Deluca, et al
as 16-11822
Defendant / Appellant: HEWITT SHAW, BAKER HOSTETLER, JAMES ROLLINSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant: STEPHANIE DELUCA
Klayman v. Deluca et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2015cv80310
Plaintiff: Klayman and Larry Klayman
Defendant: Deluca, Suzanne Jambe, Baker Hostetler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Campbell Harrison & Dagley, et al v. Albert Hill, III, et al
as 14-10507
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: LISA BLUE, BARON AND BLUE, CHARLA ALDOUS, doing business as Aldous Law Firm and others
Defendant - Appellant: ALBERT G. HILL, III, Individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr. Trust Estate, and derivatively on beha and ERIN NANCE HILL
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Campbell Harrison & Dagley, et al v. Albert Hill, III, et al
as 14-10507
Intervenor Plaintiff: BAKER & HOSTETLER, L.L.P., PBL MULTI-STRATEGY FUND, L.P., CHARLA ALDOUS, doing business as Aldous Law Firm and others
Defendant / Appellant: ERIN NANCE HILL and ALBERT G. HILL, III, Individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr. Trust Estate, and derivatively on
Type: Other Statutes RICO
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff
as 13-4106
Petitioner: Securities Investor Protection Corporation, HHI Investment Trust #2 and Defendants Listed on Exhibit A, c/o Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 919 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022, (212) 756-2000 and Irving H. Picard, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111, (212) 589-4200
Respondent: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC.
Defendant: Evenstad Family Defendants, Tereo Trust Company Limited, 83 Front Street, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda, Regulus Asset Management Ltd., 6 Front Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda and others
LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES v. LUNDY LAW, LLP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02398
Defendant: TITAN OUTDOOR LLC,, L. LEONARD LUNDY and LUNDY LAW, LLP
Petitioner: DLA PIPER LLP (US), DR. DARREN LUGIANO, ESQUIRE CARL W. HITTINGER and others
Plaintiff: LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ben-Zvi v. Pak
as 12-520
Plaintiff - Appellant: Reuven Ben-Zvi, as Assignee, Representative And Attorney in fact for and of Soon W. Choi and Samuel Pak, Samuel Pak and Soon W. Choi, individually
Defendant - Appellee: Bo Hi Pak, Sun Myung Moon, AKA Moon, Hak Ja Han Moon and others
Campbell Harrison & Dagley LLP et al v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02269
Defendant: Erin Nance Hill and Albert G Hill, III
Plaintiff: Calloway Norris Burdette & Weber PLLC and Campbell Harrison & Dagley LLP
Intervenor Plaintiff: PBL Multi-Strategy Fund LP, Law Offices of Stephen F Malouf PC, Charla G. Aldous doing business as Aldous Law Firm and others
Interested Party: Zurich American Insurance Company and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Petitioner: Melrose Properties, LLC, THH Properties Limited Partnership, D&B Thompson Investments, LP and others
Counter Defendant: Stephen F Malouf and Ms. Charla G. Aldous doing business as Aldous Law Firm
Receiver: Daniel L Jackson
Not Classified By Court: ADR Provider
Intervenor Defendant: Ahtrey Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: ClassicStar
as 10-8018
Debtor: In re: CLASSICSTAR, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES D. LYON
Defendant - Appellee: BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?