Cases 11 - 20 of 269
Abuda et al v. Strongblock et al
as 1:2022cv10869
Plaintiff:
Eileen Advincula, Chukwuemeka Agiri, Daley Antoine and others
Defendant:
David C Moss, Brian Abramson, Corey J Lederer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 Immigration: Revocation of Citizenship
Peter Szanto v. Evye Szanto, et al
as 22-35849
Appellant:
PETER SZANTO
Appellee:
EVYE SZANTO, VICTOR SZANTO, NICOLE SZANTO and others
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00770
Plaintiff:
Adams, April Burch, Tarrah Ciarimboli and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Wilson et al v. Austin III et al
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Wilson, Members of the Armed Forces for Liberty, Michael Groothousen and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Scott Wells, Annmarie Acevedo, William Timothy Adams and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pritish Vora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
USA v. John Barlow
as 22-30054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEE BARLOW
Mission Healthcare Services et al v. Renew Home Health et al
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Mission Healthcare Services and Unified Health Services
Defendant:
Renew Home Health, Jeffrey Stacy, Jennifer Tavares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sarina A. Ervin v. Gwendolyn M. Barlow
as 22-1365
Petitioner:
SARINA A. ERVIN
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. BARLOW
USA v. John Barlow
as 22-30030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LEE BARLOW
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
