Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC et al v. Samsar Inc et al
as 8:2009cv01100
Plaintiff:
Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and others
Defendant:
Samsar Inc, Zareen Husain and Ashfaq Husain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC et al v. Seung Y. Chong
as 2:2009cv06710
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, BR IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Seung Y. Chong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC et al v. Comboz, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv13422
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Comboz, LLC, Rav Group, LLC, Tazmania Donuts, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Tromboz, LLC, Ravindra Rao, Comboz, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Other Statutes
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised et al v. Internal Matters, Inc.
as 1:2008mc00080
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Internal Matters, Inc.
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS, LLC et al v. BAKERY MAESTRO, INC.
as 5:2008mc00126
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS, LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant:
BAKERY MAESTRO, INC.
Cause Of Action: Local Question
Pavlou v. Baskin-Robbins USA, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv22480
Plaintiff:
Michael Pavlou
Defendant:
Baskin-Robbins USA, LLC, Baskin-Robbins USA, LLC, Baskin-Robbins USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
