Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Lettieri v. Broome County Humane Society
as 24-528
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Place v. County of Broome et al
as NYN/3:24-CV-00258
Plaintiff:
Place, Cynthia Place and Bryan Fiddler
Defendant:
County of Broome and Jane St. Amour
BROOME COUNTY, NEW YORK v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BROOME COUNTY, NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stephens et al v. County of Broome et al
as NYN/3:24-CV-00009
Plaintiff:
Stephens
Defendant:
County of Broome
Lettieri v. The Broome County Humane Society
as 23-8098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 23-7905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant / Appellee:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Lettieri v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 23-7842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
Lettieri v. Broome County Humane Society
as 23-7796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
Joslynn Howard v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 23-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSLYNN TONJUA HOWARD and WINFRED HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
REES BROOME, SFMC, JOSEPH M. GOLDBERG and STEVEN KRIEGER
OMAR et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
AMHED OMAR SYED OMAR, RAFAEL AMEZCUA, JANETH MONTALVO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
