Cases 11 - 20 of 13,723
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Brown (Fremont)
as 24-1536
Defendant:
JEAN FREMONT, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carl Puckett, Jr., et al v. Ain Jeem, Inc., et al
as 24-5537
Plaintiff:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR. and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant:
Anthony Brown, Neil Leikach, Peggy Glascoe Geigher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2403 Constitutionality of State Statutes
CAMPUZANO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
DIANA CAMPUZANO, STUART FORCE, BEATRIZ GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GENE L. DODARO, GENERAL ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
adidas America, Inc. v. Thome Brown, Inc.
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., an Oregon corporation
Not Yet Classified:
ADIDAS AG, a foreign entity and THOME BROWN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Deandrea BrownIn re: Deandrea Brown
as 24-1479
Petitioner:
In re: DEANDREA ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
